Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

326 So. 2d 6

Hazen v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 16, 1974

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1974-05-16

Decided 1974-05-16

¶1*7ON REHEARING GRANTED

¶2The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

¶3It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, OVERTON and ENGLAND, JJ., and RUDD, Circuit Judge, concur.ADKINS, C. J., BOYD, J., and HARDING, Circuit Judge, dissent.
/326/so2d/6 · .json · Public domain