Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 SO2D 644 - State v. Camp

State v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 2011

3 state decisions

1019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Argersinger v. Hamlin · 289 So. 2d 129 - Barnett v. Develle · 312 So. 2d 675 - State v. Love · Lea v. Bougon · Hannagriff v. King

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If the order applied for by written motion is one to which mover is clearly entitled without supporting proof, the court may grant the order ex parte and without hearing the adverse party. “If the order applied for by written motion is one to which the mover is not clearly entitled, or which requires supporting proof, the motion shall be served on and tried contradictorily with the adverse party. “The rule to show cause is a contradictory motion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.