¶1 ORDER
¶2 Eugene Williams (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.
¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).