Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 SW3D 634 - In Re Morton

In Re Morton’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 26th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. State · Rivera v. State · State v. Patrick · Ex Parte Soffar · Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not read chapter 64 of the code of criminal procedure to require a separate notice of appeal for each of the three orders in this case.... Instead, we hold that in a chapter 64 proceeding the final order that denies forensic DNA testing ... or that makes the required findings following the granting of DNA testing, ... triggers the running of the notice-of-appeal deadline as to all such orders in the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.