Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 SW3D 757 - Cooper v. State

Cooper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 102nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Batson v. Kentucky · Tibbs v. Florida · Harris v. McRae · Clewis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ownership of the camera proves ownership. Without more, it cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the camera was used at a particular time by a particular person. There is no evidence that Cooper had sole possession of the location from which the videos were made. The evidence shows to the contrary. The uncontroverted evidence shows that at least several other people had access to both locations over an extended period of time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.