Bailey v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
326 U.S. 203 · 1945
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 14 district · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 110 later decisions (32 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2018 · most notably Chambers v. Mississippi (1973), Ungar v. Sarafite (1964)
13 federal appellate · 14 district · 30 state decisions — followed in 11 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Joslin Mfg Co v. City of Providence · Bragg v. Weaver · North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman · Georgia v. City of Chattanooga · Backus v. Fort St Union Depot Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 110 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But it has long been settled that due-process does not require the condemnation of land to be in advance of its occupation by the condemning authority, provided only that the owner have opportunity, in the course of the condemnation proceedings, to be heard and to offer evidence as to the value of the land taken. (Citations.) Its value may be fixed by viewers without a hearing, after entry upon the land, if their award is subject to a review in which a trial upon evidence may be had.” Bailey v. Anderson, 326 U. S. 203 , 66 S. Ct. 66, 67 , 90 L. Ed. 3, 5 .”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.