Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 326 U.S. 340 - Fernandez v. Wiener

Fernandez v. Wiener’s Empirical Analysis

326 U.S. 340 · 1945

Citation profile

420
cited by 420 later decisions
21
cited 21 times by the Supreme Court
18
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

165 federal appellate · 21 district · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 420 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2017 · most notably National League of Cities v. Usery (1976), United States v. Mitchell (1971)

165 federal appellate · 21 district · 76 state decisions — followed in 18 states

128019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 811

Relies on Helvering v. Clifford · United States v. Darby · Phillips v. Commissioner · Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co. · Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 420 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he power of Congress to impose death taxes is not limited to the taxation of transfers at death. It extends to the creation, exercise, acquisition, or relinquishment of any power or legal privilege which is incident to the ownership of property, .and when any of these is occasioned by death, it may as readily be the subject of the federal tax as the transfer of the property at death.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... It is enough that death brings about changes in the legal and economic relationships to the property taxed, and the earlier certainty that those changes would occur does not impair the legislative power to recognize them, and to levy a tax on the happening of the event which was their generating source.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(2) Community interests. To the extent of the interest therein held as community property by the decedent and surviving spouse under the law of any State, * * *,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.