State v. Cross’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 211 Wis. 2d 194 - State v. Klessig · State v. Brown · State v. Imani
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) make[s] a prima facie showing of a violation of Wis. Stat. § 971.08 (1) or other court- mandated duties by pointing to passages or gaps in the plea hearing transcript; and (2) allege[s] that the defendant did not know or understand the information that should have been provided at the plea hearing,”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Address the defendant personally and determine that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge and the potential punishment if convicted.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“bore the burden of proving, by clear and convincing 8The dissent complains we are”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.