Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
May 2005
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on New York v. Belton · Michigan v. Long · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · Maryland v. Wilson · New York v. Class
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We would also point out that Ark. Crim. P. 3.1 provides that a law enforcement officer lawfully present in any place may, in the performance of his duties, stop and detain any person whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit a felony or misdemeanor involving danger of forcible injúry to persons. While this court has not been called upon to decide if a possible DWI offense falls within the language of Rule 3.1, our Court of Appeals has held, and we believe correctly, that a DWI violation carries with it the danger of forcible injury to others. See Nottingham v. State, 29 Ark. App. 95 , 778 S.W.2d 629 (1989).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Potter v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.