McManaman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
327 F.2d 21 · 1964
Citation profile
57 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 1983 · most notably United States v. Hickey (1966), United States v. Wilson (1974)
57 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Hernandez v. Texas · Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. · Smith v. Texas · Cassell v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is insufficient, to sustain a challenge to the legality of a jury panel, to show only that a particular group of persons is not represented. The test of validity of the panel is whether there has been a systematic attempt to exclude a particular class or group which is eligible for jury service.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Williams v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.