Gajewski v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
327 F.2d 239 · 1964
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 7 U.S.C. § 1281 (Agricultural Act of 1948) · 7 U.S.C. § 1376
Relies on Wickard v. Filburn · Mulford v. Smith · Fleming v. Rhodes · United States v. Haley · Review Committee, Venue VII, Commodity Stabilization Service, United States Department of Agriculture v. Willey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It seems clear that under the regulations and instructions promulgated pursuant to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, the authority of the State and County Committees to remeasure tobacco acreage with a view to imposing penalties is limited to the period prior to the time the tobacco crop is marketed, and that a measurement deferred until after that time is ineffective to warrant imposition of penalty. Otherwise, every producer of tobacco would remain indefinitely under the hazard of having penalties imposed upon him without the opportunity to dispose of excess tobacco * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.