Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 F.2d 322 - Williams v. Taylor

Williams v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

327 F.2d 322 · 1964

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2002 · most notably Royal v. State (1964), Weekes v. Le Fleming (2002)

19 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

17019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · Wall v. Hudspeth · Hayward v. Looney · Hall v. Looney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... It is well settled that in our two systems of courts, the one which first takes custody of a prisoner in criminal cases is entitled to the custody of the prisoner until final disposition of the proceedings in that court, but during this time the prisoner is not immune from prosecution by the other sovereign .... When a state surrenders one of its prisoners to the federal government for the purpose of trial on charges pending there, a judgment and sentence upon conviction in the federal court does not begin to run, if the prisoner is delivered back to state authorities, until the prisoner is thereafter returned to federal custody and received at a federal penal institution for service of his sentence. 18 U.S.C. § 3568 327 F.2d at p. 323.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Hernandez v. United States Attorney General · Weekes v. Le Fleming

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.