Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

327 F.2d 494

Docket No. 20915.

Halliday v. Heritage

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-01-24

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1964

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-01-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Russell T. Halliday, in pro. per.

Burton Brown, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Charles L. Goodson, U.S. Atty., Gus L. Wood, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellees.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The petition for writ of habeas corpus does not assert facts which would entitle appellant to the relief sought, if true. The judgment is therefore

¶2

Affirmed.

/327/f2d/494 · .json · Public domain