Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

327 F.2d 498

Docket No. 7501.

Powers v. Taylor

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Jan. 29, 1964, Rehearing Denied Feb. 26, 1964.

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1964-01-29

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1969

13 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kimbrough v. United States · Byers v. United States · McIntosh v. Looney

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1964-01-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Jay L. Gueck, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U.S. Atty., (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LEWIS and SETH, Circuit Judges, and KERR, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant is presently confined at the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, under sentence upon conviction for a Dyer Act offense. This court has earlier considered a direct appeal. Powers v. United States, 10 Cir., 305 F.2d 157. He now appeals from an order of the District Court for the District of Kansas dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

¶2

Appellant presently contends that he was sentenced to a term of two years, should be credited with time spent in custody prior to sentencing, and consequently is entitled to immediate release. The contentions are patently without merit. The record shows appellant to have been sentenced to a term of three years; and the time of sentence begins to run only in accord with the provisions of 18 U.S.C.A. 3568 and when he was received at the place of service. Byers v. United States, 10 Cir., 175 F.2d 654; McIntosh v. Looney, 10 Cir., 249 F.2d 62, cert. den. 355 U.S. 935, 78 S.Ct. 418, 2 L.Ed.2d 417.

¶3

Affirmed.

/327/f2d/498 · .json · Public domain