In re Vitamins Antitrust Class Actions’s Empirical Analysis
327 F.3d 1207 · 2003
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 20 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Smith v. District of Columbia (2005), Pincay v. Andrews (2004)
14 federal appellate · 20 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Lowry v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. · Peters v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. · Advanced Estimating System, Inc. v. Riney · Daniel Yesudian, Ex Rel. United States of America, v. Howard University, et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the danger of prejudice to the party opposing the modification,. (2) the length of delay and its potential impact on judicial proceedings, (3) the reason for the delay, including whether it was within the reasonable control of the movant; and (4) whether the movant acted in good faith. Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co., 507 U.S. at 395, 113 S.Ct. 1489 ; see also In re Vitamins Antitrust Class Actions, 327 F.3d 1207 (D.C.Cir.2003); Yesudian v. Howard Univ., 270 F.3d 969 (D.C.Cir.2001),”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Although inadvertence, ignorance of the rules, or mistakes construing the rules do not usually constitute 'excusable' neglect, it is clear that 'excusable neglect' under Rule 6(b) is a somewhat 'elastic concept' and is not limited strictly to omissions caused by circumstances beyond the control of the movant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The Pioneer Court 'purposely fashioned a flexible rule which, by its nature, counsels against the imposition of a per se rule on attorney neglect.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.