Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 FSUPP 101 - Anderson v. Vaughn

Anderson v. Vaughn’s Empirical Analysis

1971

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 1993
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Younger v. Harris · United States v. O'Brien · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Wisconsin v. Constantineau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * we are of the view that the plaintiffs ought not be forced to violate a law affecting their First Amendment rights and subject themselves to criminal prosecution in order to place the issue before a judicial forum. Forced exposure to criminal sanctions in order to test the validity of statutory limitations of First Amendment rights is irreparable injury of sufficient dimension to justify federal declaratory relief. See Perez v. Ledesma [ 401 U.S. 82, 120 , 91 S.Ct. 674, 694 , 27 L.Ed.2d 701 (1971) (separate opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan)]." Anderson v. Vaughn, supra, 327 F.Supp. at 103 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““By way of illustration, if one were to parade a Ku Klux Klan flag or other such emblem into an NAACP meeting it would quite likely provoke a riotous reaction; or to publicly carry a Nazi flag into a synagogue would certainly be calculated to incit disorder; or to display a Viet Cong flag at a political gathering of loyal Americans might well be calculated to provoke an incitement to violence. Contrary conclusions would be both unreal and naive.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “about the circumstances under which federal courts may act when there is no prosecution pending in state courts at the time the federal proceeding is begun.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.