327 F. Supp. 714 - King v. Hampton’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. · Lumber & Sawmill Workers v. Millis · Gnotta v. United States · Swift & Co. v. United States · Ulysses S. Vigil v. Post Office Department of the United States of America and the United States of America
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“at a time and place convenient for all concerned.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.