Meyers v. Juras’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1343 · 28 U.S.C. § 2281 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Rosado v. Wyman · King v. Smith · Wyman v. James · Lewis v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““§ 235.70 Notice to law enforcement officials. “State plan requirements: A State plan under title IV-A of the Social Security Act must provide that: “(a) The appropriate law enforcement officials will be notified in writing promptly as soon as AFDO has been furnished in respect to a child who is believed to have been deserted or abandoned by a parent. This requirement has no effect upon the determination of eligibility. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Schmidt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.