¶1The State initiated administrative forfeiture proceedings under OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) against various personal property with a value of less than $25,000 owned by Jacqueline M. Alonso and Brandy N. Espiritu. The trial court dismissed the State’s complaint for forfeiture on the basis that the complaint was not timely filed, and the State *272appeals. For the following reasons, we find that the trial court erred by dismissing the complaint, and we reverse.
¶2The State seized the property
OCGA § 16-13-49 (h) (2) provides: “Within 60 days from the date of seizure, a complaint for forfeiture shall be initiated as provided for in subsection (n), (o), or (p) of this Code section.” However, subsection (n) sets forth an alternative to immediately filing a civil complaint where the seized property is worth less than $25,000. In such a case, the State may simply provide notice of the seizure and wait for a claimant to file a claim. Then, if a claim to the seized property is filed within 30 days of the notice [as set forth in subsection (n)], the State must file a civil complaint within 30 days of actual receipt of the claim. OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) (5).
¶3State of Ga. v. Profitt, 213 Ga. App. 270 (444 SE2d 356) (1994); Robinson v. State of Ga., 209 Ga. App. 446, 447 (433 SE2d 707) (1993). The State’s complaint filed pursuant to the administrative procedures set forth in OCGA § 16-13-49 (n) seeking forfeiture of seized property valued at less than $25,000 was timely filed within 30 days of receipt of the claims made by Alonso and Espiritu.
¶4Judgment reversed.
¶5 Alleging that the property was used to facilitate violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, the State seized an automobile, currency and a currency counter, and various computer equipment.