Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 ILLAPP3D 797 - People v. Kimble

People v. Kimble’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 142 Ill. 2d 13 - People v. Streit · 173 Ill. 2d 423 - People v. Nash · 97 Ill. App. 3d 38 - People v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the defendant did request treatment prior to the entry of judgment, the statute clearly provides that such treatment cannot be granted until the defendant is convicted of the offense. 20 ILCS 301/40 — 10(b) (West 2000). Thus, the trial court could not have applied TASC probation as an alternative to incarceration for the present defendant until after his conviction for residential burglary had been entered. At that point, the defendant’s prior felony barred his eligibility for TASC treatment.” Kimble, 327 Ill. App. 3d at 799-800 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.