Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 Md. 32 - State v. Harris

State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
December 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Condon v. State (1993), Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Anderson (2006)

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

230199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farmers & Merchants National Bank v. Schlossberg · Kirkwood v. Provident Savings Bank · Simpson v. Moore · Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. · Department of Motor Vehicles v. Greyhound Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[A] repeal by implication does not occur unless the language of the later statute plainly shows that the legislature intended to repeal the earlier statute. Montgomery County v. Bigelow, 196 Md. 413, 423 , 77 A.2d 164 (1950); Pressman v. Elgin, 187 Md. 446, 450 , 50 A.2d 560 (1947). Generally, therefore, a later statute will not be held to repeal an earlier statute by implication unless there is some express reference to the earlier statute. Gannon & Son v. Emerson, 291 Md. 443, 455 , 435 A.2d 449 (1981); Kirkwood v. Provident Savings Bank, 205 Md. 48, 55 , 106 A.2d 103 (1954); Thomas v. State, 173 Md. 676, 681 , 197 A. 296 (1938).””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.