Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 Md. 689 - Bailey v. State

Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
8
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Chapman v. State (1993), Simmons v. State (1994)

36 state decisions

1301992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · Ohio v. Roberts · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · White v. Illinois · Sullivan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These factors include: the presence of any additional evidence which corroborates the proffered hearsay; the type of and centrality of the issue that the hearsay is being offered to prove; and the source of the hearsay, including the possibility of bias or motive to fabricate. This is not an all-inclusive list, as other factors may affect a court’s evaluation of reliability. Furthermore, the facts and circumstances of a particular case may undermine the trustworthiness of hearsay evidence that otherwise might enjoy a high degree of reliability.” (Citations omitted).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In determining whether there is good cause to admit hearsay in a probation revocation hearing, it is obvious that the most important factor is the reliability of the proffered hearsay evidence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'that his failure to comply was not willful but rather resulted from factors beyond his control and through no fault of his own.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.