State v. Asbury’s Empirical Analysis
1931
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1983
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Tarwater · State v. Howland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under such circumstances, it can hardly be said that the officer prevented ‘any opportunity for misconduct on the part of the jurors, or suspicion of im proper influence upon them.’ On the contrary, we think opportunity was given not only for outsiders to use improper influence on the jurors, but for some of the jurors to use improper influence on other jurors.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. State“where the jurors separate, without the permission of the court, unattended by any officer, after the cause has been submitted to them to deliberate upon a verdict, where an opportunity was afforded for outside or sinister influences”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McGee“inquiry as to whether any outside or sinister influences was asserted on them, thus requiring the courts to grant defendant a new trial”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McGee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.