Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 N.C. 147 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably State v. Warren (1997), In Re the Investigation of the Death of Miller (2003)

7 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

210199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Johnson v. Righetti · Soto v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At trial the major concern is the ‘search for truth’ as it is revealed through the presentation and development of all rele vant facts. To ensure that truth is ascertained and justice served, the judiciary must have the power to compel the disclosure of relevant facts, not otherwise privileged, within the framework of the rules of evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[O]nly when all aspects of the relationship are explored can it be determined whether counsel was reasonably likely to render effective assistance.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[a]s the order of the Superior Court directed the defendant to provide the State access to “all files relating to these cases” without limiting the ordered disclosure to matters relevant to issues raised by the defendant’s allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel, the order of the Superior Court was overbroad and exceeded its authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.