Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 N.C. 364 - State v. Warren

State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably State v. Bonney (1991), State v. Jennings (1993)

3 federal appellate · 52 state decisions

320199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Strickland · State v. Cummings · State v. Ramey · State v. Laws · State v. Corn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Generally, much latitude is given counsel on cross-examination to test matters related by a witness on direct examination. State v. Burgin, 313 N.C. 404 , 329 S.E.2d 653 (1985). The scope of cross-examination is subject to two limitations: (1) the discretion of the trial court; and (2) the questions offered must be asked in good faith. State v. Dawson, 302 N.C. 581, 585 , 276 S.E.2d 348, 351 (1981).”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A mistrial should be granted only when there are improprieties in the trial so serious that they substantially and irreparably prejudice the defendant's case and make it impossible for the defendant to receive a fair and impartial verdict.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Consequently, a trial court's decision concerning a motion for mistrial will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is a clear showing that the trial court abused its discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.