327 N.J. Super. 158 - Palanque v. Lambert-Woolley’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 district · 16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. Barow · Hartsfield v. Fantini · 309 N.J. Super. 586 - Zamft v. Cornell · 318 N.J. Super. 461 - Barreiro v. Morais · Wallace v. JFK Hartwyck at Oak Tree, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the fact [that] plaintiff had an expert report in her possession before filing suit does not satisfy the statute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“some expert proof would be required to explain that the surgery was not medically necessary and to explain the impact of the misreading of the laboratory report in this regard. Plaintiff does not explain how she would actually present admissible evidence of malpractice or professional negligence. Nor does she explain how she would survive a motion at the end of her case in the absence of such testimony. [ Palanque, supra, 327 N.J.Super. at 162-63 , 742 A.2d 1002 (footnotes omitted).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“need not pass upon whether service of the expert report within 60 or 120 days would change the result, even in the absence of an affidavit....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.