Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 N.J. Super. 276 - State v. Hawk

327 N.J. Super. 276 - State v. Hawk’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Berger v. United States · Stirone v. United States · State v. Ramseur

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]rosecutors may sum up graphically and forcefully, but they may not make comments that a jury must `send a message' to the community and to the defendant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.