327 N.J. Super. 373 - State v. Hayes’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · United States v. Robinson · United States v. Sharpe · United States v. Harris · United States v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a recognized exception to the warrant requirement.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is defined as: the removal or rearrangement of clothing for the purpose of visual inspection of the person's undergarments, buttocks, anus, genitals or breasts. The term does not include any removal or rearrangement of clothing reasonably required to render medical treatment or assistance or the removal of articles of outer-clothing such as coats, ties, belts or shoelaces. [ N.J.S.A. 2A:161A-3a.] For persons such as defendant who are”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he statute is prophylactic, designed to protect citizens from an intrusive and degrading invasion of privacy. We are persuaded that the Legislature intended that all elements justifying this invasion be in place before the search occurs.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.