327 N.J. Super. 50 - State v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
March 2002
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. Barow · State v. Butler · Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc. · State v. Vasquez · State v. Kovack
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... any firearm or other weapon, device, instrument, material or substance, whether animate or inanimate, which in the manner it is used or is intended to be used, is known to be capable of producing death or serious bodily injury.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If a defendant acknowledges at the time of his guilty plea that NERA applies, a question exists as to whether he can subsequently challenge its application on appeal. Clearly, cases like State v. Warren, 115 N.J. 433 , 558 A. 2d 1312 (1989), and State v. Spinks, 66 N.J. 568 , 334 A. 2d 23 (1975), which deal with the defendant's right to appeal from a negotiated sentence, are distinguishable from the present case dealing with the validity of a required parole ineligibility term. We nevertheless conclude that the challenge before us is cognizable on appeal because we are dealing essentially with an issue of sentence legality which can be raised even on collateral attack. See R. 3:22-2(c). See also State v. Peters, 129 N.J. 210, 216-17 , 609 A. 2d 40 (1992); State v. Vasquez, 129 N.J. 189, 194-95 , 609 A. 2d 29 (1992).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whether a defendant used or threatened the immediate use of a `firearm' must be developed at a N.E.R.A. hearing under N.J.S.A. 43-7.2e, particularly if not resolved at the time of plea or by the fact-finder when use or threatened use of a firearm is not an element of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.