Eubanks v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 64 Cal. App. 474 - Grillich v. Weinshenk · Reid v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 415 - Kidd v. State · De Armond v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 326 - Woolridge v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A witness may be impeached by showing that his testimony at the preliminary hearing was different from the testimony given at the trial. This may be done by calling the attention of the witness to the specific questions and answers given at the preliminary which are contradictory. The entire transcript of the testimony of the witness should not be admitted either to show or to rebut contradictions in his testimony.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Reeves v. State · Kelsey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.