Clark v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1962
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on England v. State · 66 Okla. Crim. 178 - Yoder v. State · 94 Okla. Crim. 80 - Sandy v. State · 86 Okla. Crim. 241 - Rushing v. State · Bruner v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It was the sole province of the jury to weigh the evidence and its credibility and substance. Even though the-evidence was conflicting, the Criminal Court of Appeals will not substitute its', judgment for that of the jury where the evidence reasonably tends to support the finding of the jury.” Clark v. State, Okl.Cr. 327 P.2d 509, 510 ; Sandy v. State, 94 Okl.Cr. 80 , 231 P.2d 374 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Martin v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.