Jordan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1976
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Dodson v. State · Smartt and Carson v. State · State v. Thompson · 94 Okla. Crim. 198 - Miller v. State · 36 Okla. Crim. 225 - Harrell v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The defendant objected toi the state proving by the county court reporter certain statements made by the defendant at the preliminary hearing. * * * It is a well-settled rule that any statement of the defendant relevant to the offense for which he is being tried is admissible. Jji * * »”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lewis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.