Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 Pa. 561 - McCown v. Fraser

McCown v. Fraser’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

102 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Frowen v. Blank (1981), YOUNG v. Kaye (1971)

102 state decisions

310193719401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Leedom v. Palmer · Null's Estate · Phillips' Estate · McConville v. Ingham · Keen's Estate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In general it may be said that a confidential relation will be deemed to exist whenever the relative position of the parties is such that the one has power and means to take advantage of, or exercise undue influence over the other. ... In such case the party in the superior position is obligated, legally as well as morally, to act with the most scrupulous fairness and good faith, and to refrain from using the trust and confidence reposed in him to secure an advantage for himself.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Such a transaction will be condemned, even in the absence of evidence of actual fraud, or of mental incapacity on the part of the donor, unless there is full and satisfactory proof that it was the free and intelligent act of the donor, fully explained to him, and done with a knowledge of its consequences.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.