In re Roberts

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 22, 1997

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1997-08-22

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1998

2 state decisions

Applies SC 16 § 16-9-220

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-08-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Respondent has been indicted for acceptance of a bribe as an executive officer in violation S.C.Code Ann. § 16-9-220 (1985). The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has petitioned to have respondent placed on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Respondent has not filed a return.

¶3IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is placed on interim suspension until further order of this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J./s/ Jean H. Toal, J./s/ James E. Moore, J./s/ John H Waller, Jr., J./s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J.