Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 S.C. 329 - State v. Short

State v. Short’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 2013

10 state decisions

40199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Arizona v. Fulminante · Swain v. State of Alabama · Purkett v. Elem · Holland v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he principal function of the peremptory strike is to allow for the removal of a juror in whom the challenging party perceives bias or prejudice, even where the juror is not challengeable for cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.