Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 SO2D 607 - Borne v. Bourg

Borne v. Bourg’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 400 So. 2d 884 - Rodriguez v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc. (1981), 518 So. 2d 1077 - Toups v. Hawkins (1987)

28 state decisions

15019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Walker v. Champion · 284 So. 2d 341 - Anderson v. Clements · 210 So. 2d 528 - Spizer v. Dixie Brewing Co. · 252 So. 2d 488 - Roberie v. Sinclair Refining Company · 136 So. 2d 471 - In Re Succession of Abraham.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We agree with that broad jurisprudential rule, but only when the required bond for suspensive appeal actually furnishes security for all appellants and, perhaps, when the required bond for devolu-tive appeal in fact affords security for all costs due by all appellants, i. e., when the appellee in either a suspensive or devolu-tive appeal is afforded the full required appeal security. (Emphasis ours.) “[2] Here, the only security furnished is the bond filed by Schnell, Carbo and Rockwood Insurance. That bond binds its surety only for those three appellants; the bond does not mention Bourg. Thus, as to both the money judgment and costs, the appellee is without recourse against the surety insofar as Bourg is concerned.3 Under these circumstances, the rule relied on by Bourg has no application. Accordingly, we dismiss his appeal.” (Footnote 3. omitted.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.