Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 So. 2d 896 - Jacobs v. State

327 So. 2d 896 - Jacobs v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2000

6 state decisions

301976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bloom v. Illinois · Dyke v. Taylor Implement Manufacturing Co. · 284 So. 2d 673 - Aaron v. State · Speller v. State · 234 So. 2d 16 - Manning v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... The judgment of guilt of contempt shall include a recital of those facts upon which the adjudication of guilt is based. Prior to the adjudication of guilt the judge shall inform the defendant of the accusation against him and inquire as to whether he has any cause to show why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt by the court and sentenced therefor. The defendant shall be given the opportunity to present evidence of excusing or mitigating circumstances . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.