Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 U.S. 633 - United States v. Carbone

United States v. Carbone’s Empirical Analysis

327 U.S. 633 · 1946

Citation profile

77
cited by 77 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
October 1995
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 77 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1995 · most notably Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky (1973), United States v. CIO (1948)

29 federal appellate · 10 district ·

230194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · United States v. Borden Co. · Helvering v. Davis · Chatwin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever, by force, intimidation, or threat of procuring dismissal from employment, or by any other manner whatsoever induces any person employed in the construction, prosecution, completion or repair of any public building, public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part by loans or grants from the United States, to give up any part of the compensation to which he is entitled under his contract of employment, shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is thus apparent that the purpose of the Act is to insure that workers on federal projects shall receive the full wages to which they are entitled from their employers, many of whom had been found to be depriving the workers of their rights in this respect.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the so-called 'kick-back racket' by which a contractor on a Government project pays his laborers wages at the rate the Government requires him to pay them, but thereafter forces them to give back to him a part of the wages they have received.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.