Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 327 U.S. 92 - Case v. Bowles

Case v. Bowles’s Empirical Analysis

327 U.S. 92 · 1946

Citation profile

291
cited by 291 later decisions
46
cited 46 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

110 federal appellate · 27 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 291 later decisions (46 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2021 · most notably National League of Cities v. Usery (1976), Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority (1985)

110 federal appellate · 27 district · 20 state decisions

750194619501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBowles v. Case (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Hines v. Davidowitz · M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Yakus v. United States · United States v. Darby · Bowles v. Willingham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 291 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not operate as a limitation upon the powers, express or implied, delegated to the national government.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ * * * But here the complaint 'did not challenge the constitutionality of the State statute but alleged merely that its enforcement would violate the Emergency Price Control Act. * *” 327 U.S. 92, 97, 66 S.Ct. 438, 441.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only question is whether the state's power to make the sales must be in subordination to the power of Congress to fix maximum prices in order to carry on war.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.