In Re Parsons’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1992
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2001
Relies on Catlin v. United States · Morrison v. Burnette · United States v. Fay Heasley, Fay Heasley and Selma Heasley v. United States of America and Henry W. Anderberg, Receiver, Fay Heasley and Selma Heasley v. United States of America and Henry W. Anderberg, Receiver · Everett v. Forst · Taylor v. England
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The trial court held a hearing on October 20, 1972, to air Richards’ objections which included, along with certain irrelevancies, concern over the loss of rental income. The trial court, perceiving the issue to be what would be in the best interest of the ward and the ward’s estate, found ‘that it is in the best interest of the estate of the ward, and of the ward individually, that the conservator be permitted to proceed to the private sale of the real estate in question ....’ The court then ordered the conservator to proceed with a private sale of the one-half interest.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.