Moore v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2021
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Scott · Beverly Enterprises-Arkansas, Inc. v. Arkansas Health Services Commission · Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Muncrief · Franklin v. Arkansas Department of Human Services · Files v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must prove that such action was willful and unreasonable, without consideration and with a disregard of the facts or circumstances of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“valid, legal, and persuasive evidence or such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“so nearly undisputed that fair-minded persons could not reach its conclusions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.