Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.2d 358 - United States v. Berkowitz

United States v. Berkowitz’s Empirical Analysis

328 F.2d 358 · 1964

Citation profile

139
cited by 139 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 40 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 139 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works (1986), Roofing & Sheet Metal Services, Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. (1982)

38 federal appellate · 40 district ·

610196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6502 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1396 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Brown Shoe Co. v. United States · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Abel v. United States · Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan · Corey v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought ...”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he district court believed - that it was without power to transfer this case under § 1404(a) in the absence of jurisdiction over the person of the defendant. But Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, [ ], conclusively settled that question. It is true that Goldlawr involved an interpretation of § 1406(a). Nevertheless, we think that its rationale applies equally to § 1404(a), for these are companion sections, remedial in nature, enacted at the same time, and both dealing with the expeditious transfer of an action from one district or division to another.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.