Frank Ursich v. Manuel D. Da Rosa’s Empirical Analysis
328 F.2d 794 · 1964
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Blassingill v. Waterman Steamship Corp. (1964), Ashland v. Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. (1983)
17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Garrett v. Co · Anne Sweeney v. William G Errving · Johnson v. United States · Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co. · Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“expect[ed] counsel to be aware of it and to frame proper instructions . . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.