Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.3d 1039 - Koerner v. Grigas

Koerner v. Grigas’s Empirical Analysis

328 F.3d 1039 · 2003

Citation profile

141
cited by 141 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

47 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 141 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Nuru v. Gonzales (2005), Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc. (2004)

47 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

950200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Wainwright v. Sykes · Michigan v. Long · Harris v. Reed · Ylst v. Nunnemaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 141 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “will not ordinarily consider matters on appeal that are not specifically and distinctly argued in appellant's opening brief.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “First, we will review an issue not present in an opening brief for “good cause shown”, or “if a failure to do so would result in manifest injustice.” Second, “[w]e have discretion to review an issue not raised by appellant ... when it is raised in the appellee’s brief.” Third, we may review an issue if the failure to raise the issue properly did not prejudice the defense of the opposing party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “ `if a failure to do so would result in manifest injustice.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.