No. 01-56055’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. · Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc. · Amf Incorporated v. Sleekcraft Boats E · Clicks Billiards Inc Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc an Arizona Corporation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith, 279 F.3d 1135, 1140 (9th Cir.2002) (quotation marks and citations omitted). B. Trademark Infringement 14 In evaluating the parties' motions for summary judgment and summary adjudication, it is easiest to frame the relevant issues in the context of a trademark infringement action. KP's motion raises essentially issues that are defenses to an infringement action. 15 The Lanham Act allows the holder of a protectable trademark to hold liable any person who, without consent,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 01-56055“Likelihood of confusion exists when consumers viewing the mark would probably assume that the goods it represents are associated with the source of a different product identified by a similar mark.... The Ninth Circuit generally relies on an eight-factor test [Sleekcraft ] in determining whether a likelihood of confusion exists.”) (emphasis added). . Cf. Slaven v. Am. Trading Transp. Co., Inc., 146 F.3d 1066 , 1069 (9th Cir.1998) (stating it is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“making the term the most dominant feature of the image. The brochure on which this image appears contains a chart displaying all the various colors in which KP's pigments are available. An illustration of the term in the marketing brochures is shown in Appendix B. 9 In March 2000, KP commenced this trademark declaratory relief action against Lasting. In response, Lasting counterclaimed, alleging that KP's use of the phrase”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. No. 01-56055
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.