Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.3d 1374 - James v. Santella

James v. Santella’s Empirical Analysis

328 F.3d 1374 · 2003

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2022
most recently cited

7 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2022

7 federal appellate ·

90200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1204 · 5 U.S.C. § 1215 · 5 U.S.C. § 2302 · 5 U.S.C. § 504 (Equal Access to Justice Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 7701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Duncan v. Walker · Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission · Buckhannon Board and Care Home Incs v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the agency engaged in a prohibited personnel practice; (2) the agency’s action was clearly without merit or wholly unfounded, or the employee is substantially innocent of all charges; (3) the agency initiated the action in bad faith; (4) the agency committed gross procedural error that prolonged the proceeding or severely prejudiced the employee; or (5) the agency knew or should have known that it would not prevail on the merits when it brought the proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[wjhile we typically do not address issues that are raised for the first time at oral argument, we choose to do so here”). 12 . We note that Covenant § 604 refers to “excise taxes on goods manufactured, sold or used or services rendered,” corroborating the broad meaning and use of the term “excise” in the Covenant. 13 . Current legal dictionaries also define”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.