Stone v. Doerge’s Empirical Analysis
328 F.3d 343 · 2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Wilko v. Swan · Southland Corp. v. Keating
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]here is no denying that many decisions proclaim that federal policy favors arbitration, . . . this differs from saying that courts read contracts to foist arbitration on parties who have not genuinely agreed to that device.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]s there is no thumb on the scale in favor of one judicial forum over another, there is no preference for arbitration over adjudication either.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“to implement the parties' preferences between judicial and arbitral forums, not to displace that choice with one of our own.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.