Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.3d 343 - Stone v. Doerge

Stone v. Doerge’s Empirical Analysis

328 F.3d 343 · 2003

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Wilko v. Swan · Southland Corp. v. Keating

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]here is no denying that many decisions proclaim that federal policy favors arbitration, . . . this differs from saying that courts read contracts to foist arbitration on parties who have not genuinely agreed to that device.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a]s there is no thumb on the scale in favor of one judicial forum over another, there is no preference for arbitration over adjudication either.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to implement the parties' preferences between judicial and arbitral forums, not to displace that choice with one of our own.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.