Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.3d 389 - Racicky v. Farmland Industries, Inc.

Racicky v. Farmland Industries, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

328 F.3d 389 · 2003

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan (2003), Stevenson v. Union Pacific Railroad (2004)

16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

270200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on El Fredo Pizza, Inc. v. Roto-Flex Oven Co. · World Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. Coopers & Lybrand · Chlopek v. Schmall · Bass v. General Motors Corp. · K & R, INC. v. Crete Storage Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Judgment as a matter of law is appropriate only when all of the evidence points one way and is susceptible of no reasonable inference sustaining [Children's] position.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “we must examine the sufficiency of the evidence in the light most favorable to [Children's] and view all inferences in [its] favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a cause (1) that produces a result in a natural and continuous sequence and (2) without which the result would not have occurred”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.