Coffman v. Glickman’s Empirical Analysis
328 F.3d 619 · 2003
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 29 U.S.C. § 206 (Equal Pay Act of 1963) · 29 U.S.C. § 631 (§ 12 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 791 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 5 U.S.C. § 7702 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Hughey v. United States · Begier v. Internal Revenue Service · Williams v. Department of Army · Costa v. Desert Palace, Inc. · Williams v. Rice
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Discrimination cases “subject to the provisions of section 7702” include cases where an employee or an applicant for employment (1) has been affected by an action of an agency which may be appealed to the Board and (2) alleges that the basis for the agency’s action was discrimination prohibited by, inter alia, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“consonant with the purpose of the Civil Service Reform Act”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.