Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 328 F.3d 77 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

328 F.3d 77 · 2003

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
February 2025
most recently cited

18 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably United States v. Caldwell (2006), United States v. Sabhnani (2010)

18 federal appellate ·

150200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. United States · Neder v. United States · Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization · Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc. · Bryan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We review a jury charge in its entirety and not on the basis of excerpts taken out of context.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.